RTX A6000 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+5948%
38710
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
640
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
4
10752
Shading Units
512
336
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
336
Tensor Cores
16
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
10W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GA10B
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
