RTX A5500 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+2460%
34100
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
16
10240
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF110
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
