RTX A5500 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1785MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+832%
34100
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3656
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A5500
+393%
15878
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A5500
+462%
8016
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
16
10240
Shading Units
1024
320
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
TU117
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
