RTX A5500 vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
10224 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+131053%
34100
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
2
10240
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
230W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
