RTX A4000 vs Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1560MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+532%
19170
Quadro P2000
3031
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A4000
+272%
11079
Quadro P2000
2973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A4000
+297%
5367
Quadro P2000
1350
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
40
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GP106
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
