RTX A4000 vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+4049%
19170
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
24
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
