RTX A4000 vs Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+3844%
19170
Quadro 4000
486
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
8
6144
Shading Units
256
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
142W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF100
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
