RTX A3000 Mobile vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1230MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile
+880%
10080
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
32
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
