RTX A1000 vs GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+17174%
6737
GeForce 210
39
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
