RTX A1000 vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+234%
6737
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1440
72
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0