RTX A1000 vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+461%
6737
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
800
72
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
