RTX A1000 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+1255%
6737
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV670
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1