RTX A1000 vs FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+431%
6737
FirePro W4000
1267
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1