RTX A1000 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+8321%
6737
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
80
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0