RTX A1000 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+20953%
6737
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
