RTX A1000 vs FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
+4578%
6737
FireGL V3600
144
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
-
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
120
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
