Home Comparison RTX 6000 Ada vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

RTX 6000 Ada vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +485%
91060
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15560

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
256
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net