RTX 6000 Ada vs GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
18104 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+48336%
91060
GeForce GT 320 OEM
188
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
9
18176
Shading Units
72
568
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
43W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT215
AD102
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
