RTX 6000 Ada vs GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
18160 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+202255%
91060
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
45
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
2
18176
Shading Units
16
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G96C
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
