RTX 6000 Ada vs FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+3349%
91060
FireStream 9370
2640
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1600
568
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cypress
AD102
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0