RTX 6000 Ada vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
16736 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+4416%
91060
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1440
568
TMUs
72
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cypress
AD102
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
