RTX 6000 Ada vs FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+1638%
91060
FirePro W9100
5238
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada
+638%
26240
FirePro W9100
3552
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
2816
568
TMUs
176
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD102
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
