Home Comparison RTX 6000 Ada vs FirePro S9050

RTX 6000 Ada vs FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +2722%
91060
FirePro S9050
3226

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1792
568
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD102
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net