RTX 6000 Ada vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18096 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+113725%
91060
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
80
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
17W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cedar
AD102
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0