RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
14040 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 285W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+216368%
69270
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
40
440
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
433.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1082 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
69.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
69.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1082 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
285W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV620
AD102
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
