RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
7632 additional rendering cores
NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+39530%
39630
NVS 315
100
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
1
7680
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
