Home Comparison RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs H3C XG310

RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (2580MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +1564%
39630
H3C XG310
2381

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2070 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

60
SM Count
-
7680
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
24
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
DG1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
379 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net