Home Comparison RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTS 250

RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +10140%
39630
GeForce GTS 250
387
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +1707%
19774
GeForce GTS 250
1094

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

60
SM Count
16
7680
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

210W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net