RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
7600 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+49437%
39630
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
60
SM Count
-
7680
Shading Units
80
240
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
210W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0