RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1747MHz vs 1746MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+49%
13410
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8945
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Feb 2018
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
20
3840
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GP104
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
16 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
