RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (1746MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+466%
13410
Quadro K5100M
2369
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+717%
10406
Quadro K5100M
1273
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+843%
4783
Quadro K5100M
507
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jul 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GK104
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
