RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+2802%
13410
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
24
3840
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
