Home Comparison RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GRID M40

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GRID M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1591%
13410
GRID M40
793

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GM107
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net