RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2573%
26730
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Workstation Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1