RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Mobility FireGL V5250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
12
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
M66
-
GPU Variant
M66-P
(216BGCKC13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
