Radeon X1650 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
AD107
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
