Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
Shading Units
400
8
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
Redwood
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
