Radeon X1600 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 27W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
27W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
