Home Comparison Radeon RX 7800 XT vs FireStream 9270

Radeon RX 7800 XT vs FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 263W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7800 XT +3010%
37320
FireStream 9270
1200

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi III
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1295 MHz
Base Clock
-
2430 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2438 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
624.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
10
3840
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

233.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
583.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
74.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1166 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

263W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 32 XT (215-180000006)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net