Radeon RX 6750 XT vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+1009%
13310
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2150 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
10
2560
Shading Units
800
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
166.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
416.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
26.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
832.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 22
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
335 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
