Home Comparison Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2815MHz
Lower TDP (107W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 143.9GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6500 XT
5765
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +84%
10650

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Navi II
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2310 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2248 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
32
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

90.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
180.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
11.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
5.765 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
360.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

107W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Navi 24 XT (215-135000006)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
107 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net