Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 53W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
+10085%
3565
GeForce 210 PCI
35
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
53W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
GT216
Navi 24 XL
(215-135000046)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
