Radeon RX 6400 vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (53W vs 150W)
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
+256%
3565
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
53W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 24 XL
(215-135000046)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
