Radeon RX 6400 vs CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2321MHz vs 1545MHz)
Lower TDP (53W vs 250W)
CMP 50HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
3565
CMP 50HX
+210%
11070
Blender
Radeon RX 6400
334
CMP 50HX
+314%
1384
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2021
Navi II
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1923 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
12
RT Cores
56
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
53W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
TU102
Navi 24 XL
(215-135000046)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
