Home Comparison Radeon RX 640 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Radeon RX 640 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 640 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2010MHz vs 1218MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 640 Mobile
1559
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +692%
12350

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1082 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1218 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
48.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
1.559 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
1.559 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
97.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 23 XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net