Radeon RX 590 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2130MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590
7119
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+68%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon RX 590
4775
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+70%
8147
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon RX 590
2147
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+67%
3601
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Feb 2024
Polaris
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1469 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2304
Shading Units
2816
144
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
49.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
7.119 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
445.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Polaris 30
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 30 XT
(215-0922006)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
