Home Comparison Radeon RX 580G vs FireStream 9250

Radeon RX 580G vs FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 580G and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 580G 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1330MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 580G +512%
6129
FireStream 9250
1000

Graphics Card

Oct 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Polaris
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1330 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

42.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
191.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.129 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.129 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
383.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
RV770
Polaris 20 XTX (215-0910038)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net