Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R5 340X OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5700 XT
+1311%
9754
Radeon R5 340X OEM
691
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
May 2015
Navi
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1605 MHz
Base Clock
-
1905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
6
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
304.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
19.51 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.754 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
609.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 10 XT
(215-0917210)
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
