Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2344 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5700 XT
+1719%
9754
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1605 MHz
Base Clock
-
1905 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2560
Shading Units
216
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
121.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
304.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
19.51 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.754 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
609.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 10 XT
(215-0917210)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0