Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560
+268%
2611
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1175 MHz
Base Clock
-
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
81.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
2.611 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.611 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 21
GPU Name
GT200B
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
